From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20a8a8dc3168fb57a078bee99724cc8e@ladd.quanstro.net> References: <033fb4bad1a5301dc98a6c7610c48bd9@ladd.quanstro.net> <20110403145714.GF1805@fangle.proxima.alt.za> <64dce36b5502bd3ef48f9aff2dee7ff6@ladd.quanstro.net> <3964FC73-8FBC-4A38-8A0C-38B7B5DD270B@gmail.com> <20a8a8dc3168fb57a078bee99724cc8e@ladd.quanstro.net> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 00:27:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Skip Tavakkolian To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: cb4ee58a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 the point is that if the linuxemu is provisioned properly (gmake, gcc, bash) to build the Plan 9 $GOBIN from source, then there wont be a need for a linux build box, or porting and maintaining gmake, gcc, bash, etc. one could also build Plan 9 binaries under linuxemu. options as i see them are: 1. a linux build environment for Go which is also a partial dev environment (i.e. where 8g and 8l will run) 2. port (and maintain) all gnu tools needed to build Go from sources under Plan 9 3. a linuxemu build environment that is complete enough to compile Go and serve as Go compilation environment -Skip On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 10:46 AM, erik quanstrom wro= te: > On Sun Apr =A03 12:27:29 EDT 2011, skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com wrote: >> Why can't we use linuxemu to run the build? >> > > sure we could, =A0but then you have to maintain linuxemu, and > go. =A0that seems silly. > > - erik > >