From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110404172728.GA2000@fangle.proxima.alt.za>
References: <AANLkTik3gx8QK7O-+O=R8oFELTt6WgVHO3dJV51cZiPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=7L-mqU=mFODnGcYCmyvR02M=MLFzKPpH2v2B1@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110403211333.GA3905@dinah> <20110403211652.GA5977@dinah>
	<BANLkTimMZsyffBpswywUGcsso77mz_71kA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110403223031.GA27441@dinah>
	<BANLkTi=8HYNLhAA8_-PDPBvkAJ-DWN+HWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110404172728.GA2000@fangle.proxima.alt.za>
Date: Mon,  4 Apr 2011 16:10:15 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTik2eDtFj6yD3qBPMo0rqj6Rvb4D9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] Go Plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c90fd0c2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:

> May I suggest that we identify Go executables, because they may not run
> under 9vx, as different from Plan 9 executables and adjust the Plan 9
> kernel to identify these and avoid running them under 9vx?


um, yuck :-)

anyway, all you're saying is "don't run go on 9vx". That's a solved problem :-)

ron