From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <itqhp8$o4b$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca>
References: <BANLkTimYXsqytzny6vAT3LMomLvfwx3mXw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTikF=mVwD5L68Vp4Wm6+k7FunmJsHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<itqhp8$o4b$1@rumours.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:20:27 -0800
Message-ID: <BANLkTimjfVPteGKf_ZDgoHFHiQwr3epCsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] Mousing is faster than typing but users not believe it
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f359eb6a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:48 AM, William Cowan <wmcowan@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> Sample tasks at random you say. What is the correct universe to sample
> if we wish to substantiate the sort of categorical assertions made on
> this thread?

Also, familiar vs unfamiliar tasks using familiar vs unfamiliar
software. The number of UI variables are mind boggling, which is why I
find it hard to get hot headed over any of the assertions, but tend
toward trusting the research.

Beating the dead horse,

-Jack