From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <74c86eb06fc5a9c3ab50a6769a5bc1ed@gandalf.orthanc.ca>
References: <c89eaec21d84a59d6fa643e50b6220a7@quintile.net>
	<74c86eb06fc5a9c3ab50a6769a5bc1ed@gandalf.orthanc.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 03:03:57 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinOSuzhCG54cWGbOTCrAC4mxyxw6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Akshat Kumar <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] kfs: i'm not dead yet!
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e28bf666-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I use kfs (not kenfs) on old edge nodes that
serve as relays, nameservers, and provide other
basic services, but are otherwise too limited to
be able to handle the abuse of fossil. I also use
it on my headless Acer Aspire One that runs as
an auth server at home.


Best,
ak

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
<lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
>> kfs is not used for standalone machines these days, so I suspose you
>> could say it is depricated for use as a primary file server.
>
> I suspect kfs (not kenfs) is used on a whole lot of laptops these
> days. =A0I have four laptops in the house that have standalone kfs Plan
> 9s running under Parallels and Fusion. =A0All of which also net-boot
> diskless configs from the local fileserver when in range.
>
> --lyndon
>
>
>