From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110512203000.3202DB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <20110512164916.GA12861@clanspum.net>
	<BANLkTinK=h+6_4DVEM1YG0kp_kZzumVEtQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110512185230.20B9AB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<20110512190313.GA14768@clanspum.net>
	<20110512203000.3202DB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:45:38 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTinOU7Npcgr_6TLY09snjuQ8aY8Lig@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Iruat=C3=A3_Souza?= <iru.muzgo@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] exportfs / u9fs / v9fs / npfs / spfs versus 9vx
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e30888f2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:03:13 CDT Daniel Lyons <fusion@storytotell.org> =
=C2=A0wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:52:30AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
>> > On Thu, 12 May 2011 13:14:55 CDT Stanley Lieber <stanley.lieber@gmail.=
com>
>> =C2=A0wrote:
>> > > http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/plan9/sys/src/cmd/unix/u9fs
>> > >
>> > > This is the basis of the OpenBSD port.
>> >
>> > unix/9pfreebsd is really too old to be useful but may be one
>> > can start a new FreeBSD port from the openBSD bits? =C2=A0I'd be
>> > interested in such a thing.
>
> I was thinking of a kernel port (mount_9ufs etc). My hopes
> were briefly raised until I realized the openBSD port is not a
> kernel port. Though I am not sure if a kernel port is worth it
> (and it is certainly a bunch of work).
>
>

http://src.oitobits.net/o9fs. It is not finished, but was written for
the OpenBSD kernel.