From: devon.odell@gmail.com (Devon H. O'Dell)
Subject: [9fans] Go Plan 9
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 13:43:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinmg4mU99ctnxk1UuYaR1vsmiYPGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110403145714.GF1805@fangle.proxima.alt.za>
Does -fplan9-extensions not do that? Its in the latest gcc for gccgo...
On Apr 3, 2011 11:26 AM, "Lucio De Re" <lucio at proxima.alt.za> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:34:28AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>
>> but there definately are some difficult bits. this hacked
>> inclusion of stdio.h is a problem on plan 9.
>>
>>
http://code.google.com/p/go-plan9/source/diff?spec=svnd6ec95bd4f9b2e9af2d10f08d9869aa2ca49d851&r=d6ec95bd4f9b2e9af2d10f08d9869aa2ca49d851&format=side&path=/src/cmd/8a/a.y
>>
> As GNU says, GNU is not Unix (or Plan 9). There is no #ifdef-free
> way to satisfy both toolchains unless one wants to pervert the Plan 9
> toolchain. One trivial change to GCC, namely Plan 9's use of empty names
> to represent unused arguments, would improve GCC greatly, but is unlikely
> to be accepted by the developers. The alternative is a pain in the butt.
>
> But I agree with Erik, the changes to port the Go toolchain to Plan 9
> are quite extensive and would require a great deal of care, I have done
> a similar job a year ago. Actually, I think it was two years agon and
> I failed to resurrect my efforts a year later.
>
> I'm not sure whether the compiler, assembler and linker that seemed
> to work after my first attempts could be used to bootstrap a fresh
> source tree. I put no effort in place on the Go package side, so that
> remains to be tried.
>
> In passing, Erik, you made some changes to Yacc to accept //-comments,
> do you still have those at hand? Do you have some idea why they were
> not applied to P9 Yacc?
>
> ++L
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.9fans.net/private/9fans/attachments/20110403/197a21f4/attachment-0001.html>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-03 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-03 9:40 Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-03 10:34 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-03 14:42 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-03 14:57 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-03 15:43 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-03 16:25 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-04-03 17:46 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-06 7:27 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-04-03 17:43 ` Devon H. O'Dell [this message]
2011-04-03 17:58 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-03 18:20 ` Rob Pike
2011-04-03 20:45 ` Lucio De Re
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-09 18:53 Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-09 19:04 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-04-09 22:01 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-10 5:07 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-10 6:28 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-10 9:15 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-06 13:27 Joel C. Salomon
2011-04-06 16:16 ` David Leimbach
2011-04-05 19:15 Jason Catena
2011-04-04 19:19 Russ Cox
2011-04-03 16:49 Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-03 17:36 ` Lucio De Re
[not found] <AANLkTik3gx8QK7O-+O=R8oFELTt6WgVHO3dJV51cZiPQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-02 22:56 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-02 23:00 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-04-02 23:52 ` David Leimbach
2011-04-03 0:04 ` ron minnich
2011-04-03 0:04 ` ron minnich
2011-04-03 0:11 ` ron minnich
2011-04-03 0:16 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-04-03 0:09 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-04-03 7:57 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-03 2:18 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-04-03 2:48 ` Rob Pike
2011-04-03 5:07 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-03 18:50 ` Steve Simon
2011-04-03 20:57 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-03 7:45 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-03 7:51 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-04-03 9:16 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-03 21:13 ` Anthony Martin
2011-04-03 21:16 ` Anthony Martin
2011-04-03 21:23 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-03 22:30 ` Anthony Martin
2011-04-04 7:37 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-04 17:27 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-04 19:18 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-04 20:05 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-04 20:11 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-04 20:33 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-05 4:52 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-04 23:10 ` ron minnich
2011-04-05 4:33 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-05 4:56 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-05 6:37 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-05 19:06 ` Yaroslav
2011-04-05 20:14 ` Paul Lalonde
2011-04-06 13:43 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-09 17:51 ` Sergey Kish
2011-04-09 18:24 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-04-09 18:34 ` Pavel Zholkover
2011-04-03 21:24 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-04 15:18 ` ron minnich
2011-04-04 15:59 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-04 23:09 ` ron minnich
2011-04-04 23:17 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-04 23:27 ` ron minnich
2011-04-05 4:00 ` ron minnich
2011-04-05 4:22 ` Russ Cox
2011-04-05 4:47 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-05 5:11 ` Russ Cox
2011-04-05 5:44 ` Lucio De Re
2011-04-05 5:53 ` Russ Cox
2011-04-05 15:48 ` ron minnich
2011-04-05 17:33 ` ron minnich
2011-04-05 17:33 ` David Leimbach
2011-04-05 17:32 ` David Leimbach
2011-04-05 17:36 ` erik quanstrom
2011-04-05 17:42 ` David Leimbach
2011-04-05 17:43 ` andrey mirtchovski
2011-04-05 17:48 ` David Leimbach
2011-04-05 10:42 ` Anthony Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTinmg4mU99ctnxk1UuYaR1vsmiYPGw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devon.odell@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).