From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [9fans] permission bit of /mail/box
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
From: Kenji Arisawa <arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <2f4afda7d3b5d4a89b9d83d59ba6a57e@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Message-Id: <BC1122AC-ECC5-11D7-BC2F-000393A941BC@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:26:43 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4082df1a-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Russ Cox:
> It is not at clear to me that an "no archive" bit is such
> a good idea.  My main objection is that it is implicit -- if
> I set the bit for /usr/rsc, it's hard to see quickly that
> /usr/rsc/lib/profile is not archived.

I think "no archive" bit is not allowed directory if we introduce it,
though I am skeptical about the necessity of the bit.

Kenji Arisawa