From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Sorace Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DB254A6B-433E-45C3-831B-97D6C3B403DC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:42:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> References: Message-Id: Subject: Re: [9fans] Reading gmail Topicbox-Message-UUID: 932aedc4-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --Apple-Mail=_DB254A6B-433E-45C3-831B-97D6C3B403DC Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On May 19, 2012, at 13:37 , Akshat Kumar wrote: > Both upas and nupas die instantly on my > mail box. I've gotten tired of filtering through > my mail for (n)upas choking hazards. What > frail software. I'd be curious what the failures were (and I bet Erik would, too). (o)upas used to have a hard time with very large mailboxes, but i've not seen nupas have that issue. In particular, I've never seen individual messages cause it to die (although I have seen individual messages be poorly parsed). I think "frail" is a mischaracterization. --Apple-Mail=_DB254A6B-433E-45C3-831B-97D6C3B403DC Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk+4BaIACgkQyrb52b5lrs4nngCfY/oS/rDiY9FZZGpz1wJxN7ue SKwAn247eS1m8BTujtTRrH+cOl27vzns =NcOt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_DB254A6B-433E-45C3-831B-97D6C3B403DC--