From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-id: <C32B0441-6F70-4274-8D50-8EE6B7E648E3@mac.com>
From: dave.l@mac.com
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
In-reply-to: <1257590719.28012.1344036163@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Sun,  8 Nov 2009 14:19:52 +0000
References: <55c52a87f0b8c0ac12a81a150f110b2b@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20091101184418.GM19125@gradx.cs.jhu.edu>
	<d1c554290911030730m64a7d415k23e5622510438b4f@mail.gmail.com>
	<1257590719.28012.1344036163@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] dtrace for plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 97fecf7a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I don't know anything specific about DTrace,

<insert-obvious-and-boring-sarcastic-comment-here/>

> but I'm thinking a clear,
> consistent interface for logging and tracing kernel operations sounds
> like a good thing.


So am I, but how does this relate to dtrace?

D