From: Paul Lalonde <plalonde@telus.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 on the Cell...
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 11:34:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7531346-4D4D-431D-AE09-67736E968E41@telus.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0505281151050.21084@enigma.lanl.gov>
Really, for the PPC64/Cell compiler I don't care about the name...
But then we also need a compiler for the SPUs; that will be much more
annoying to deal with :-)
Paul
On 28-May-05, at 10:56 AM, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
> Actually, I learned a good bit more about the whole Cell situation
> this
> morning, from the chipset level on up to the 'when will systems get
> out'
> level. The situation is, to say the least, murky, and will be for a
> while.
>
> However: If we were to put effort into a G5 port, which is cheap to do
> (buy a mac!), we'd be ready to rock and roll on the Cell when systems
> become more generally available.
>
> So, Plan 9 is getting fixed for 64-bit mode, we have a K8 compiler
> now as
> a template. What do we name the compiler?
>
> Cell C (or cc)? Just joking!
>
> G5 C or gc? I'll stop now.
>
> ron
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-28 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-24 19:05 Paul Lalonde
2005-05-24 19:26 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-05-24 23:04 ` Paul Lalonde
2005-05-24 23:18 ` Jack Johnson
2005-05-24 23:27 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-05-24 23:30 ` Paul Lalonde
2005-05-25 3:11 ` Bruce Ellis
2005-05-27 16:53 ` Paul Lalonde
2005-05-28 6:29 ` andrey mirtchovski
2005-05-28 14:51 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-05-28 17:45 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-05-28 17:56 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-05-28 18:11 ` Jack Johnson
2005-05-28 18:31 ` jmk
2005-05-28 18:34 ` Paul Lalonde [this message]
2005-05-29 6:35 ` Noah Evans
2005-05-29 9:26 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-05-30 20:43 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-06-03 11:55 ` Noah Evans
2005-06-03 12:57 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-06-03 15:46 ` Dave Eckhardt
2005-06-03 16:43 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-06-03 17:33 ` Brantley Coile
2005-06-03 21:22 ` David Leimbach
2005-05-29 9:26 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-05-24 23:26 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-05-25 9:10 ` C H Forsyth
2005-05-25 15:07 ` Ronald G. Minnich
[not found] ` <a4e6962a050525081244ed619d@mail.gmail.com>
2005-05-25 15:13 ` Fwd: " Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-05-25 15:30 ` C H Forsyth
2005-06-21 16:46 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-06-10 14:04 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-06-10 16:44 ` Paul Lalonde
2005-06-10 18:43 ` Bruce Ellis
2005-06-11 3:17 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-06-11 3:38 ` Tim Newsham
2005-06-11 3:45 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-06-11 19:36 ` C H Forsyth
2005-06-12 21:36 ` arisawa
2005-06-12 22:55 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2005-06-12 23:54 ` George Gensure
2005-06-13 2:39 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-06-13 5:17 ` Martin C. Atkins
2005-05-28 19:21 jmk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C7531346-4D4D-431D-AE09-67736E968E41@telus.net \
--to=plalonde@telus.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).