From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f3f098de7f5c908e757a63a8294ca28e@coraid.com>
References: <CAP6exYKf6RL6J8MU1E3vc4y_TarbYzowkeHdTrpZ1Q5ved9faQ@mail.gmail.c>
	<4e9d35a0ea36a6a12462d0fb9c6517e7@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<DB4B0FF2-7C01-484A-8373-3FCCCFE61A42@gmail.com>
	<265090f70295e251716890fc90b4f8f9@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<CA+N-5bYxuADQJ1e2PChv7RZA8DdpHcqvnotX7jSnSPxxYK1Bbw@mail.gmail.c>
	<f3f098de7f5c908e757a63a8294ca28e@coraid.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:42:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+N-5baFk3464kjBRr54x+14=3J-tab_h+5D9PiGDezpjxBEhQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] NIX 64-bit kernel is available
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 216d42ae-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

In the experiments I made I was sending all results through shared memory
(a pointer to the reply).
But I don't think that code is in the main rep.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:13 PM, erik quanstrom
<quanstro@labs.coraid.com> wrote:
> On Thu Sep 15 10:04:54 EDT 2011, nemo@lsub.org wrote:
>> I could run old binaries. Perhaps profiling no longer works for them,
>> didn't even try.
>> Either way, we had no choice. We had to put some stuff in there.
>
> i wasn't complaining. =C2=A0i just wanted to make sure. =C2=A0also, for t=
he
> nixcalls, where does the error string memory go?
>
> - erik
>
>