From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110908203547.C1CF1B827@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <9b73a2f7842fdf54ca57423261c7ae78@brasstown.quanstro.net> <201109081504.36357.dexen.devries@gmail.com> <20110908194409.743FBB827@mail.bitblocks.com> <20110908203547.C1CF1B827@mail.bitblocks.com> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:43:53 +0200 Message-ID: From: Francisco J Ballesteros To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] 9ttp Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1c491640-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 And it's likely we'll have it again :) For nix, I've just implemented something called IX, while is mostly multiplexing a single stream to provide concurrent channels and then send modified 9p requests on them, to be able to put/get entire files like op does. The server seems to work, and the protocol, according to early testing, I'm with a caching client doing 9p<>IX, as we speak. >> Deja vu here--I know we just discussed this about a month ago :) > > Deja vu all over again. We seem have this discussion every N months. >