From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <69667ecfc3e88acb8b5495181c2e0eb9@proxima.alt.za>
References: <CAP6exYKdMstU2C5WoovVYmmsMZw1q13uhVDK2gGe70y1A_Sfag@mail.gmail.com>
	<69667ecfc3e88acb8b5495181c2e0eb9@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Fri,  2 Dec 2011 09:49:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+N-5bbncjaqb9S-WnOz64iyhEyoyMfVmYMyVbnHeLOa0QMXfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] Building Go on Plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4ac02b9e-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Well, that's actually the approach Ron would choose for nix.
IIRC, there were a bunch of mkfiles added to the std. go tree
to make it compile, but I may be mistaken.
Ron knows better.


On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
> I would be interested
> in the approach Nemo might choose for nix.