From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <103b012cdb5c55bca54c751bb88fb57c@brasstown.quanstro.net> <787846152d3d67fec1b9cb19e132bfb9@harness.quanstro.net> <4fe2933badd703359cb8f618d73d8065@coraid.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:31:56 +0200 Message-ID: From: Francisco J Ballesteros To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] gar nix! Topicbox-Message-UUID: 239786c0-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I agree, but I think it's ok if we use them only if we have them, and rely = on just 2M otherwise. On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:28 PM, ron minnich wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:57 AM, erik quanstrom > wrote: > >> please don't make it required. =C2=A0there's already array of page sizes= per mach. > > sorry, but time moves forward. We need the 1G pages for user mode > anyway -- so the fact that you can run on older machines is a happy > coincidence but it will die the first time you run a process that uses > more than 1G. Reducing PTE count by 512 is a not insignificant cost. I > expect to put the 1G pages for the kernel map back in in the next > while. > > ron > >