It certainly addresses my use case.  I'll give it a spin when I next have 5
minutes to mess with it.

Paul



On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
> On 13 January 2014 18:30, Paul Lalonde <paul.a.lalonde@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That seems even more magical, I think.
>>
>
> The idea is that the dump file is a snapshot of a particular state, and it
> made sense to me to update
> the given state, instead of putting it back in the default file despite
> being given an explicit state.
> That seemed to me a bit contrary.
>