i'm sorry, what? lack of TLS?

go read 9front's tlssrv(8). it's been there for a while already.


-rodri

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020, 11:32 AM Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:

>
> fyi i have been running a fossil/venti pair since 2004 and it has been
> solid.
>
> what is too big - honest question.
>
> i thought the biggest issues are:
>
> performance - the elegance and generality sacrifice some performance,
> though this is not a problem for me.
>
>  lack of a tls fs interface - there is (imho) no excuse for a lack of tls
> these days.
>
> no way for a user in (say) the ventidump group to request an immediate
> dump - handy for checkpointing a code release, though justing copying the
> release to a new dir is ok.
>
> no way to push a vac score into the /archive hierarchy - nice for
> migrating in other backups.
>
> all these are fixable and on my todo list but none have happened.
>
> > On 10 Jan 2020, at 9:37 pm, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 
> >>
> >> The major fly in the ointment is the outdated sha1 hash function used
> by venti
> >
> > major? fly? there's no problem with how sha1 is used by venti right now.
> >
> > a more substantial complaint would be that the venti/fossil system is
> > way too big.
>
> ------------------------------------------
> 9fans: 9fans
> Permalink:
> https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Ta5071137bc09d294-M7a56202f84a795cc3e7d9a1e
> Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
>