From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8fe7f4f0-f6bc-2ba1-468f-517d27817259@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Rodrigo_G=2E_L=C3=B3pez?= Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 11:38:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da5c0e0593211160" Subject: Re: [9fans] building Alef language Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0abe6788-eada-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --000000000000da5c0e0593211160 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" so you need them running in order to execute them publicly, in front of the go masses. On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 9:48 AM Phil Kulin wrote: > You right. I am preparing slides for my report on upcoming > GolangConf-2019 in Moscow. I need Alef, libthread and Limbo for > explaining some golang features. > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 6:16 AM Lucio De Re wrote: > > > > I have a version for legacy Plan 9, lightly tested, that I have not > > looked at in ages. > > > > Happy to haul it out, but I see little value in it. Go may have > > idiosyncrasies, but it is much more suited to modern architectures. > > That said, had Go not surfaced, I would have much preferred Alef to > > many other options. > > > > Don't forget the rationale for dropping Alef: support for the > > language, across many architectures and including many libraries would > > have been crippling. > > > > Both of those are now Go's strong suits. > > > > Lucio. > > > > PS: A tar archive may be on sources under "proxima" - it's been a long > time. > > > > > -- > Non nobis Domine non nobis sed Nomini Tuo da gloriam > Phil Kulin > > --000000000000da5c0e0593211160 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
so you need them running in order to execute them pu= blicly, in front of the go masses.

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 9:48 AM Phil Kulin &l= t;schors@gmail.com> wrote:
You right. I am preparing slides for my = report on upcoming
GolangConf-2019 in Moscow. I need Alef, libthread and Limbo for
explaining some golang features.

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 6:16 AM Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
>
> I have a version for legacy Plan 9, lightly tested, that I have not > looked at in ages.
>
> Happy to haul it out, but I see little value in it. Go may have
> idiosyncrasies, but it is much more suited to modern architectures. > That said, had Go not surfaced, I would have much preferred Alef to > many other options.
>
> Don't forget the rationale for dropping Alef: support for the
> language, across many architectures and including many libraries would=
> have been crippling.
>
> Both of those are now Go's strong suits.
>
> Lucio.
>
> PS: A tar archive may be on sources under "proxima" - it'= ;s been a long time.
>


--
Non nobis Domine non nobis sed Nomini Tuo da gloriam
Phil Kulin

--000000000000da5c0e0593211160--