From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_CSS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23316 invoked from network); 29 May 2022 10:33:25 -0000 Received: from tb-ob1.topicbox.com (64.147.108.173) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 29 May 2022 10:33:25 -0000 Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (tb-mx0.nyi.icgroup.com [10.90.30.73]) by tb-ob1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3284210A3 for ; Sun, 29 May 2022 06:33:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bounce.mMb23151be1bea68b8a1ac928c.r522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa@9fans.bounce.topicbox.com) Received: by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix, from userid 1132) id CB27125626B2; Sun, 29 May 2022 06:33:23 -0400 (EDT) ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; topicbox.com; arc=pass; dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=W0XVHTpy header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fgergo@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ed1-f45.google.com; x-internal-arc=fail (as.1.topicbox.com=pass, ams.1.topicbox.com=fail (message has been altered)) (Message modified while forwarding at Topicbox) ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:list-help:list-id:list-post :list-subscribe:reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :list-unsubscribe; s=sysmsg-1; t=1653820403; bh=DPaF0MQ+Oi7p1iV6 kanvQMPcrU63L5oRDsKKggirVzM=; b=YEmlcM1QTsRO7lXv6H7xe6jkEy7UNdy6 jjio/reGFD2CZXg+TTxhB7/SXDgqrCa5Hv/v9hLWPYApWXIDVIJo6WAHY9B6THPP AMFWyMxQJ1vNiSPR1LCO3S9gO8wp6qQALNgDpLGUj6BHyEK6XsklhSrbofhCpKxo oE9rDygezmU= ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; cv=pass; d=topicbox.com; s=sysmsg-1; t= 1653820403; b=hodvCLP16M3ESOHIQ7kxZgycZqbrkrWPtXRxAlyII18uA8lXMR rJUvNNKQKstMRmsFd2sshVyji5SL/iixOhkupZCPUBZw6YO/EZEyGxjy9v0P6pz3 4YVZHRv4G1pbtRIB/fzwdFd9JAfnQMVNcvflBnKaigHBaAf59J8gaISMk= Authentication-Results: topicbox.com; arc=pass; dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=W0XVHTpy header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fgergo@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ed1-f45.google.com; x-internal-arc=fail (as.1.topicbox.com=pass, ams.1.topicbox.com=fail (message has been altered)) (Message modified while forwarding at Topicbox) X-Received-Authentication-Results: tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=skipped (DMARC Policy is not at enforcement); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=W0XVHTpy header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.208.45 (mail-ed1-f45.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fgergo@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ed1-f45.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=NflNpHfG; x-me-sender=none; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ed1-f45.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ed1-f45.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=9fans.net; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject :to:content-type:list-help:list-id:list-post:list-subscribe :reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:list-unsubscribe; s=dkim-1; t=1653820403; x=1653906803; bh=DPaF0MQ+Oi7p1iV6kanvQMPcrU63L5oR DsKKggirVzM=; b=J2e5a2Zy34dWKTniytoGuCpsOP6NdCWGEGdwl43KgspLFY7O pNoXar8dic7z/4mPjmURn2XR0u3BjQFzrXY27gmLrBxUVPvZ218K46Bg8/N5/C8M cyxddkGvwAg4AZsaduM/ZeJlDPOr3DvYFxGUZvBFalg7F9xMrw8F22vG9XE= Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDB114CD909 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 29 May 2022 06:33:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from fgergo@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id A302F85336E; Sun, 29 May 2022 06:33:12 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1653820392; b=O7n7QT6qMuoJeYYI1Mabv8OmieG/FjP9sjFzSrjizitNJZFoPu 9i15U/TUMU8pTLixSHTu5E9/caqt5FZRTqAwBTVgfjOcTeo4MeZMw9oT4lQr1p8k U9qqaXkn+yRdrmBOgZrmZ7miIbpnsL94Dbx5qKDBVA7mjIQ/PqljlqM+9uADHRZf INslKAPNpKcwOCX0Sf4ibrvCnRHmslhcJiVJJHJT0nrlFFXAzgv9UwV7c5qmKQYY ppTzAeBtl5XIVYuAfJoNusdu5MZm0oTmQJhboZD1aoC+yo42IVXDnwSmEUOlJc2M GzKeuO7K8rOKTYBlfTQhE5kfXbA8asd9bQ+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1653820392; bh=iT5Sz9X6yAN6UTyDFzI2a/ru0rki0ZJJRGfbSh4U7CI=; b=jr0+mXgdVTAt 1/BDwKCE5BehQbZWAF+qJmOjTh5EtYj9qjEkdOLSZsGCLTzKybb0cZOyYnhfYNaS oPC2HTwK6bk2x/CD17GtkqUX8vrUBTNmbZvwHj3SSpD9J0QwMczR2Xi1WJbpe5+5 sR8P1YmdJ9RbA0sUCVfDmvFD58/KYVbMLzu1NFR9e9kWLdRsP1mxvUD8pNjWMA39 yY1rCmMUlPFxzvv4ClhTanoaclnACmKjfctcvdeSJG7D9GW+/Iu+AKYnMngiSrDm LtAjvCfPp+loNcx4+OYPPEtyhNjdw13eWdUhZ7IgE//9QP0duVq881CTsU+6Xub7 AJeauVySkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=skipped (DMARC Policy is not at enforcement); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=W0XVHTpy header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.208.45 (mail-ed1-f45.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fgergo@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ed1-f45.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=NflNpHfG; x-me-sender=none; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ed1-f45.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ed1-f45.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrkeeggddvkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepjghfhfffkf fuvfgtsehttdertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpehfghgvrhhgohesghhmrghilhdrtghomhen ucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefjeeliefhteejieeffeevfeegheeiheeitdeuhfeuleegje fftdffffekleejudenucffohhmrghinhepshgvmhgrnhhtihgtshgthhholhgrrhdrohhr ghdpshhuphgvrhdrohhrghdpthhophhitggsohigrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvtdelrdekhe drvddtkedrgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthep vddtledrkeehrddvtdekrdeghedphhgvlhhopehmrghilhdqvgguuddqfheghedrghhooh hglhgvrdgtohhmpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehfghgvrhhgohesghhmrghilhdrtghomheq X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'fgergo@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx1.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="fgergo@gmail.com"; helo=mail-ed1-f45.google.com; client-ip=209.85.208.45 Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 29 May 2022 06:33:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from fgergo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id v25so2161422eda.6 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 29 May 2022 03:33:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=iT5Sz9X6yAN6UTyDFzI2a/ru0rki0ZJJRGfbSh4U7CI=; b=NflNpHfGxjb3fko7nw93aFESBHTUFIz9Lj3c0y4anYE7pxlyDBZqOliTH8x/ej0GIT 6SuNSbOq95WkPIequA/N1bEFx0PZz2IfJJHdH0VWjRovpHwpvbL5e/AVHF4DOY800PFZ 3NM/zl56E1dcDPHYaAldhud1bwsykhNhLjpx12rlg6fnapu4vx9WdNG+q5KAEHXwj+8L h2upkt+AUhRhm1cpSleYZt86mGXam9+qdFd9b7iRSA3bIVohBJlS5CkF+X6sckKTuIBK s4/98DnOd4H3Xro59ka8yhzVE3NVValzbiRWXUnf7IvibFMwU0LAhWqCuIhnN1iOKIDR D8Ig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kN4YISod2S/Cn3zZ0Pi1a7zGDTCc08t1aYH4LtOZ6C+YBnE9Q hTTJdSEjw1clJvLEcy8RU28fvcJE677qJcTsmqWmD1YfRDE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyc64RCVv7SLP/JX9Q9IRj9R7N+gl7yQflYWjuk3lO7HpYKmB3XRjcEZhXDYOuDg3AsNPdxkoGxHo+hocIstH8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:520e:b0:42b:360b:78e1 with SMTP id s14-20020a056402520e00b0042b360b78e1mr43679046edd.186.1653820391030; Sun, 29 May 2022 03:33:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6408:e9:b0:180:187:c58b with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2022 03:33:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: fgergo@gmail.com Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 12:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p server to multiply 9p messages? To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: c080d28e-df3a-11ec-bef4-92d682a8e6e8 Archived-At: =?UTF-8?B?PGh0dHBzOi8vOWZhbnMudG9waWNib3guY29tL2dyb3Vwcy85?= =?UTF-8?B?ZmFucy9UNzY5ODU0ZmFmZDJiN2QzNS1NYjIzMTUxYmUxYmVhNjhiOGExYWM5?= =?UTF-8?B?MjhjPg==?= List-Help: List-Id: "9fans" <9fans.9fans.net> List-Post: List-Software: Topicbox v0 List-Subscribe: Precedence: list Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Unsubscribe: , Topicbox-Delivery-ID: 2:9fans:437d30aa-c441-11e9-8a57-d036212d11b0:522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa:Mb23151be1bea68b8a1ac928c:1:bSQBieT7qL6keXs9jwrZf_I_66UaHXX58uJk1MvzGcE Thanks yes, this would be one use-case. On 5/28/22, ron minnich wrote: > not for 9p, but in 1993, when Gene Kim interned with me at the > Supercomputing Research Center, we did this: > https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Bigfoot-NFS-%3A-A-Parallel-File-Str= iping-NFS-Server-(-Kim/19cb61337bab7b4de856fcbf29b55965647be091, > similar in spirit to your idea. > > The core idea was that we distributed the files over the set of > servers, and replicated directory trees to avoid the usual troubles: > we did not want to implement a metadata server. So each NFS request > was fanned out to 32 machines, vector rpc style, and because the > networks of that time were so slow, it was not that much slower than > you'd expect. > > It worked, it gave us what was at the time a really big NFS server, > the paper got rejected twice at usenix, the original full paper is > long lost, the code? probably lost too. > > It was available from super.org in 1993, but ... that's not on the > wayback machine. > > On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 11:45 AM Skip Tavakkolian > wrote: >> >> Interesting idea! >> >> This assumes the downstream servers have identical namespace hierarchy; >> right? >> >> State management could be messy or impossible unless some sort of >> transaction structure is imposed on the {walk, [open/create, >> read/write]|[stat/wstat], clunk} sequences, where the server that >> replies to walk first, gets that transaction. >> >> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 9:04 AM wrote: >> > >> > Has anybody considered (or maybe even implemented) a 9p server to >> > multiply incoming 9p messages to 2 or more 9p servers? >> > Maybe with 2 different strategies for responding to the original >> > request? >> > 1. respond as soon as at least 1 response from one of the 9p servers >> > is received, >> > 2. respond only after all responses had been received. >> > thanks! ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T769854fafd2b7d35-Mb2315= 1be1bea68b8a1ac928c Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription