From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EFB8A5C8-2093-4F81-AE31-09805EAECEB2@bitblocks.com>
References: <CAA6Yd9U0GDakGZn0whEtDo7hmYque3uiQFs7GJ1SnaVT2_joAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<EFB8A5C8-2093-4F81-AE31-09805EAECEB2@bitblocks.com>
From: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <vu3rdd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  6 Jun 2014 21:22:09 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA6Yd9UbkxxBrXx9VHW3=0K+EJpG+HmrGPY_pN2gN3W2-qpVXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] suicide message on vmware
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f69a53bc-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 5, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <vu3rdd@gmail.com=
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw a suicide message on 9atom running on plan9 while updating
>> the system:
>>
>> % replica/pull -v /dist/replica/network
>
> I missed that you were running 9atom. Using old binaries to copy the new =
kernel to /n/9fat and rebooting means now you're running the bell labs kern=
el. I don't know how different the two kernels are but if you want to conti=
nue running 9atom everything, you may have to undo nsec related changes in =
the userland.

I thought that replica/pull on a 9atom would pull 9atom binaries and
not the labs version. Looks like that assumption is wrong?

--=20
  Ramakrishnan