From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20140606060012.6FF9AB82A@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <CAA6Yd9U0GDakGZn0whEtDo7hmYque3uiQFs7GJ1SnaVT2_joAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<0c96d15d8e671ed86a19351e0334e096@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAA6Yd9WFC3szbN0f=Hz6wDZOQYj5nxZ_9uXMfcjGQkVPF89CHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA6Yd9XYn5Ouc0OxqJHdE8rqhgXkupsxaPGK0mFAerCGRnsnRQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140606060012.6FF9AB82A@mail.bitblocks.com>
From: Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <vu3rdd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  6 Jun 2014 13:02:14 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA6Yd9WXBn4ppX0yjK0phgkqq9va1FAZ2ADAP99YtUs2XUSGnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] suicide message on vmware
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f5c046ea-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 10:48:21 +0530 Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <vu3rdd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Well, looks like I cannot run any binaries anymore and getting the
>> suicide message! I don't have anything critical on this vm image and
>> can re-install it. But I want to see if I can recover it and how. I
>> will re-read the "syscall 53" thread to look for any solutions.
>
> Aren't the old binaries saved under the same name  but
> prefixed with _?  If you haven't rebooted yet, you can use
> those to copy the new kernel to the FAT partition.

Thanks, I didn't know that old binaries are kept prefixed with _. Very nice!

I copied the kernels from David (9legacy.org/download/kernel.tar.bz2),
untar'ed it. This copied into /386/9pcf. Then I do:

9fat:
_cp /386/9pcf /n/9fat/9pcf

But I get an error message: '/n/9fat/9pcf clone failed'.