From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d76c4d501abff0ca6da3e12240c997cc@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <CAOw7k5j5ePe1QYw7nmkXQA8pRhsgEDLUuFus48rUUX6uS9HOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<826abb8cf0c1ea41e3ebc081df3169c7@proxima.alt.za>
	<CAOw7k5ggBBkJYOX_Qa-9Jh+h3D7wcYsmpjWyexFMba46LPvRrQ@mail.gmail.c>
	<d76c4d501abff0ca6da3e12240c997cc@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 08:51:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAQydVgmiRskjrgK+U3YABAc6Wodu=ZN6YTHQsCHcttK8woQEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: michaelian ennis <michaelian.ennis@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] Acme: the way the future actually was
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b9e0ac4c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:19 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:

> neither is knowledge of oberon ubiquitous among 9fans, who may
> not realize that acme itself is a copy.

Isn't even that a derivation of the window system from PARC?  Oak I believe?

Ian