From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <009d09bf2b5b2c3ccba4007fdd7b516d@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <CANPzgjQtY-sAu9ufeB6=S7iV0_WzOvKHjEZ4Q2W0bcAXpdjY9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFSF3XN_NcKfMzugkhoj2CTaBF6Gfdke0XstEjPqcjr9FswpPw@mail.gmail.c>
	<9b73a2f7842fdf54ca57423261c7ae78@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<201109081504.36357.dexen.devries@gmail.com>
	<CAJJ04x7xC4iuqm0HOzKN-Jb3FSmg8w1E+1Lc06pYaOm_diBNsQ@mail.gmail.c>
	<e32ce6bd7da90c32bcdecf4ab2de0ca6@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<CAL4LZyhu4sNGo+ALVyPaVsOrZdhaM_LtQr_33xe6SLzrGMYVFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110908194409.743FBB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<CAL4LZyj6F4HwvrnM+nEyLjGsXa8j+Vt+7eqHPjmK54SjRZCeig@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110908203547.C1CF1B827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<CAP6exYKARAZWWWXfK6myj+y47k3XmNnyF4z17zuHOZHczxDOhw@mail.gmail.c>
	<009d09bf2b5b2c3ccba4007fdd7b516d@ladd.quanstro.net>
From: Venkatesh Srinivas <me@acm.jhu.edu>
Date: Thu,  8 Sep 2011 19:51:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAcG=3Ny6kTe=yZ0--wgf6ZEVG4jZ29Evw_1cCQa_vR69NZpbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9ttp
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1c6719c4-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:32 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrot=
e:
> On Thu Sep =C2=A08 19:31:19 EDT 2011, rminnich@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas <me@acm.jhu.edu> wrot=
e:
>> > Just asynchronous TClunk is enough to improve 9P's performance over
>> > high-latency links dramatically.
>>
>> not my experience, but I'm willing to be convinced.
>
> iirc, async clunks are dangerous.
>
> -erik

I never agreed with that conclusion from the oct 2010 discussion here.

-- vs