From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <201107111743.28781.dexen.devries@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:56:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jacob Todd To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555b19a97cbbd04a7ce1016 Subject: Re: [9fans] interesting(?) widgets idea Topicbox-Message-UUID: fee499e4-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --00032555b19a97cbbd04a7ce1016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jul 11, 2011 12:14 PM, "Peter A. Cejchan" wrote >however, my point was another: aint you annoyed by needless things that just consume your pixels?? can't it all be done more efficiently?? even if the win borders were 1px wide, wont it be more elegant at least? and why should acme's tagline (s) consume so much pixels, if they can be [possibly] replaced by an [editable] command frame ... yes, i cant prove it, sust a silly idea... butb still feeling a disconcert between rio and acme ui paradigm... cant it be unified? No. your editor window would probably take up more room than acme's tag lines. --00032555b19a97cbbd04a7ce1016 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Jul 11, 2011 12:14 PM, "Peter A. Cejchan" wrote
>however, my point was another: aint you annoyed by needless things that= just consume your pixels?? can't it all be done more efficiently?? eve= n if the win borders were 1px wide, wont it be more elegant at least? and w= hy should acme's tagline (s) consume so much pixels, if they can be [po= ssibly] replaced by an [editable] command frame ... yes, i cant prove it, s= ust a silly idea... butb still feeling a disconcert between rio and acme ui= =C2=A0 paradigm... cant it be unified?

No. your editor window would probably take up more room than acme's = tag lines.

--00032555b19a97cbbd04a7ce1016--