From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <547C0A85.9090906@gr13.net> References: <546981BE.90704@gr13.net> <547A2280.4020407@gr13.net> <547A388C.2030006@gr13.net> <7fed26ea40724d100df8e86bb79b0a32@lilly.quanstro.net> <547C0A85.9090906@gr13.net> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 12:14:26 +0000 Message-ID: From: Stuart Morrow To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] Factotum vs SASL Topicbox-Message-UUID: 30ac0c80-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > The guy in front of the console should authenticate as a normal user But you do authenticate to Plan 9 as a normal user. On one node you're the hostowner, but to the *system* you authenticate as a normal user. One guy on here lately was actually attaching to his fileserver as none. A "system" is more than one of something, computers in this case. > only be allowed to access his own environment (no direct control over hw, etc). The hardware is part of his environment. > So, what about multiuser environments, where the guy in front of the > console is just an arbitrary user, who shouldn't be allowed to access > everything on the machine (nor disturb other users) ? Plan 9 is _decidedly_ multi-user. I don't really understand the question. Which console? Stuart