From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net (Akshat Kumar)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:25:38 -0800
Subject: [9fans] Errata and Addendum: A standard also sucks if it
 includes the word "advanced"
In-Reply-To: <CAP6exYK+o=QR7QDWBwOsn64T6Fb_y8UJ05AA8ZnEcoNsHHjzwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP6exYK+o=QR7QDWBwOsn64T6Fb_y8UJ05AA8ZnEcoNsHHjzwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABwSpPB3vfOqxZzLUYgFp95zVoGWfzbBqUM4PcXgE-2Mat+DXg@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4077d5d8-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

If applying the A does the latter, then I'd say it's nilpotent
of degree 2.

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
> Or just do something like this:
> A^2PCIC
>
> Either way, it must be really really great!
>
> Or maybe it just really really sucks. I vote for the latter. So we
> have another new rule for Standards That Suck.
>
> ron
>
>