From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aa932a2f326dde12bfb3f120e239ba27@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <CABwSpPC9vsKJ4W0V8DzJ4r0WDmV_Yg8OzD+so6ah=rGQXev35g@mail.gmail.c>
	<aa932a2f326dde12bfb3f120e239ba27@ladd.quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:30:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CABwSpPC0Et4BWUYaa4Sb-iV00TSNFYXGkfJBN=CgPXvopPSWRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Akshat Kumar <akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>,
	erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] fs(3) for pseudo partitions
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fdd60330-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 8:05 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wro=
te:
> there are several simple options
> - write a little sd driver. =A0see sdloop(3) for
> a prototype.

Ah, so such a thing can't be done simply
with some fs(3) configuration?

The sd driver would concatenate the specified
list of files, and keep in the header, some
partition lines, in the vein of sd(3) data files?

>
> - modify vblade to serve multiple luns.
>

Is there any reason you decided against this
in the past? Some drawbacks?


Thanks,
ak