From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: From: Lyndon Nerenberg To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:39:42 -0800 References: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6a24a82e-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 2008-Feb-29, at 22:02 , Eric Van Hensbergen wrote: > It will no doubt be useful to us folks doing work for the gov't. They > DOE has lots of apps written for GCC or Fortran -- while there may be > other methods of accommodating these applications, having them "just > work" with GCC (particularly if the GCC fortran could be part of the > port) would help us a lot. It could also serve as a baseline for > performance/efficiency comparisons with other methodologies such as > linuxemu, etc. But none of this code will "just work" on Plan 9 (especially the Fortran code), so what's the point? --lyndon