[9fans] echo -n and zero-length write(2)

[9fans] echo -n and zero-length write(2)

[cherry]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]

Hello Fans,

When echo(1) is invoked with -n and no or empty arguments, it calls
write(2) with zero length. When writing to a pipe, the other end of the
pipe read()'s zero byte, which causes it thinks it's got to the end and
close the pipe, and commands after the "echo -n" would fail to write. I
start thinking whether this is the desired behavior. On one hand, it is an
easy way to do a zero-length write() through echo -n, also it is consistent
for echo(1): to do a write(2). On the other hand, it makes rc script
behaves differently if sending to a pipe, and probably some people would
expect empty echo -n is just a no-op. Which should be better?

The context is, as posted on the werc list, it's template.awk generates rc
script with echo -n, and the output of the script is sent to a pipe. When
the argument is empty it fails. My last post was wrapping echo as

fn echo { builtin echo $* | cat }

But invoking cat for every echo hurts the performance. Perhaps the most
efficient way is to write an ad hoc echo that does not do zero-length
write(2)? Any suggestion?

Thanks,
- cherry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1189 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] echo -n and zero-length write(2)

[Anthony Sorace]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 445 bytes --]

> Any suggestion?

There is no "better" answer to this question. You are advised to
read "The Unix and the Echo"[1], by Doug McIlroy,  and Russ Cox's
adaptation for our system, "The Plan 9 and the Echo"[2].

If you need different behavior than what's there, you want
something other than echo.

[1]	http://everything2.com/title/The+UNIX+and+the+Echo)
[2]	https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.os.plan9/Bg-gyAzbWiE/VZj7qSVn5uIJ


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 169 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] echo -n and zero-length write(2)

[cherry]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 360 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net> wrote:

> > Any suggestion?
>
> There is no "better" answer to this question. You are advised to
> read "The Unix and the Echo"[1], by Doug McIlroy,  and Russ Cox's
> adaptation for our system, "The Plan 9 and the Echo"[2].
>

Thanks for pointing me to the right direction :)

- cherry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 718 bytes --]