9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cherry <lunaria21@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: [9fans] echo -n and zero-length write(2)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:27:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACzOosDi7uK-JPvTcdN3So9VzhkjmfvBto0YwUTkdWka41r65Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1114 bytes --]

Hello Fans,

When echo(1) is invoked with -n and no or empty arguments, it calls
write(2) with zero length. When writing to a pipe, the other end of the
pipe read()'s zero byte, which causes it thinks it's got to the end and
close the pipe, and commands after the "echo -n" would fail to write. I
start thinking whether this is the desired behavior. On one hand, it is an
easy way to do a zero-length write() through echo -n, also it is consistent
for echo(1): to do a write(2). On the other hand, it makes rc script
behaves differently if sending to a pipe, and probably some people would
expect empty echo -n is just a no-op. Which should be better?

The context is, as posted on the werc list, it's template.awk generates rc
script with echo -n, and the output of the script is sent to a pipe. When
the argument is empty it fails. My last post was wrapping echo as

fn echo { builtin echo $* | cat }

But invoking cat for every echo hurts the performance. Perhaps the most
efficient way is to write an ad hoc echo that does not do zero-length
write(2)? Any suggestion?

Thanks,
- cherry

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2014-01-24  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-24  3:27 cherry [this message]
2014-01-24  4:10 ` Anthony Sorace
2014-01-25  5:12   ` cherry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACzOosDi7uK-JPvTcdN3So9VzhkjmfvBto0YwUTkdWka41r65Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lunaria21@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).