From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160911174854.GA75143@wopr>
References: <BY2PR0301MB0662694837687F02F72F1003E4FC0@BY2PR0301MB0662.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
	<CADNhbx03LW71z1NV=4UuZojEXQt+WQH=ZdGXyvkGq=SnnbXTEg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160911174854.GA75143@wopr>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpcyBEb23DrW5ndWV6?= <andresdju@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:36:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CADNhbx1tUxkA0FSXR72AQ5E2DH5THpWj43kT7rDMEhUKKX8hzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Distros
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9d21a1c2-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

2016-09-11 19:48 GMT+02:00 Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 07:39:31PM +0200, Andr=C3=A9s Dom=C3=ADnguez wrot=
e:
>> 2016-09-11 18:40 GMT+02:00 Benjamin Huntsman <BHuntsman@mail2.cu-portlan=
d.edu>:
>> > with amd64 support?
>>
>> the rpi image
>
> I predict suffering.

I understood that he wanted to start with a distribution with amd64
support, not to start running it on amd64. Most, if not all, rpi
sources has been integrated into bell labs' distribution. It's not
clear to me if he wants the distribution with better amd64 support or
the most used/developed/supported with amd64 support (from the
question looks more the later).

Andr=C3=A9s