From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8E19F9CB-8B69-4D0A-A36B-2D4D9CB23F05@bitblocks.com>
References: <20111002163800.GA12773@polynum.com>
	<CADSkJJUgvPSSMLkw=XvShUxXextAkQkk5mHGU36mtc1x5y+zMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8A064A89-7AA3-4BDF-8F8A-51D1AA1F408F@bitblocks.com>
	<CADSkJJUgioDmKY0sy475L_92fyAOV-GeOtB5q1pOaNNt3CTotA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8E19F9CB-8B69-4D0A-A36B-2D4D9CB23F05@bitblocks.com>
Date: Mon,  3 Oct 2011 11:47:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CADSkJJUbWMqWNHNFf6bL8o+ND2tLibCbsGDpAchCXwGWcKg+Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] circular fonctions: precision?
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 30386980-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:
> I don't get it. Surely go has a FFI? Or Are you planning to reimplement many libraries in go?

Using FFI for square root is overkill.

Russ