From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20120420213934.1v2ed14r3r0kc80c@courrier.univ-paris1.fr> <305C962A-7E92-484E-94ED-4E499A1CC3CB@orthanc.ca> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:58:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] git and (p9p) acme From: Russ Cox To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7f5091dc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote= : > A lack of expectation. =C2=A0I.e. I expect 'sam foo' to, well, edit 'foo'= . =C2=A0'acme foo' does that, as does 'ed foo.' =C2=A0From a UI perspective= , the 'sam foo' behaviour is as non-intuitive as it gets. > > If 'sam foo' (i.e. with a single filename argument) loaded the file into = the edit window, it would mimic the behaviour of almost every other editor = out there. Are you complaining that 'sam foo' pops up a sam window and you have to click to place the new window for foo instead of having the window automatically placed? Otherwise, I don't know what you're talking about. sam foo starts a copy of sam editing foo. Russ