From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1327f5027eaa9481a13e08f02cae8327@proxima.alt.za>
References: <CADSkJJUxqP8fduF+rhK4sM60wF8rGuVdyR6Bf9X2OYadmE_VoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1327f5027eaa9481a13e08f02cae8327@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:19:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CADSkJJVZU=BHib+My6CxOg6Xnk2EiWkndctMUS8i7bBp1PbV+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] C compiler error?
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za
Cc: 9fans@9fans.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4ef29972-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
> What is the expected status? =C2=A0Is Anthony's CL to be abandoned in
> favour of the change to the Plan 9 C compiler (give or take the other
> nit of a "static" definition)? =C2=A0I don't have a problem with minor
> unofficial changes to the Plan 9 distribution, but others may object.

Since you sent this publicly, I will reply publicly.
We're not going to change the Go code to avoid
switches on 64-bit numbers, which are increasingly
common.  I assume that Anthony will take care of
submitting the patch through the usual channels
and getting it applied.

Russ