From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <51f1e63c93964ae652bc2d38be222af4@lvoc.net>
References: <86vcoif5f4.fsf@cmarib.ramside>
	<51f1e63c93964ae652bc2d38be222af4@lvoc.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:25:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CADSkJJXzKuT+8E0SeNOdN9heXR9kGeBSasMmZr9rq=tA=jNuwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9/plan9port coding conventions
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 58388802-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Style is style; it is not defensible on its own.
If I were contributing to smiley's projects, I would
make the code look the way the rest of his code
does.  It's not that one way is necessarily better,
but one way is definitely least distracting in a given
context.

Russ