On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Comeau At9Fans <comeauat9fans@gmail.com> wrote:regs() might be interesting, along with asm(*PC).
> The app. 9vx will continue to run after it. It give a little dump thing on
> the screen with "1476 The.App fault 0x4 no segment" send to the shell
> account 9vx was started from. Running acid on the app does not appear to
> bring up a line of code that should really be having a problem (though of
> course if it's a bug I could be wrong).
If I remember the output format correctly that looks
like it faulted accessing 0x4, which seems more likely
a null pointer deref than stack overflow.
Probably nothing at all. If 9vx had been crashing then
> What will be the difference in this version in regards to a problem
> like the one I'm seeing?
the difference would hopefully have been '9vx doesn't
crash anymore'. :-)