From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <db83a632f1edae42784ced3ecee857c1@mikro.quanstro.net>
References: <53295712.1050505@gmail.com>
	<CAOCRf5VZUFj7RxAo8QeP+TwPxW8zyygEx1D8Wi42iUnPtUxWrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANZw+5f1EkfiAMtTs9LrorLMqkGkVGercyy3H3YrCSQ_eypeVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM6ozu5RWPv_SzUdynUjgPGOJ9D0tC8H=k08qof08nHdCJ74EQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEAzY39va+9K9+cGJZzra3TT2-LQL9A397YvcFya2zOwrttKaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<db83a632f1edae42784ced3ecee857c1@mikro.quanstro.net>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJhbSBIxIN2xINybmVhbnU=?= <aram.h@mgk.ro>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 17:16:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEAzY3-3+u9ArhCSGtg4xnsJd0MkvX8hOqLBCru7qbMm7jDF7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] GSoC proposal: Alternative window system
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc2e7ec8-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:17 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wro=
te:
> On Wed Mar 19 10:14:26 EDT 2014, aram.h@mgk.ro wrote:
>> What did old Oberon have?
>>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberon_(operating_system)
>
> - erik

Yes, I know what Oberon is, I even used it. Peter mentioned something
"old Oberon" had, which suggests it is something "new" Oberon doesn't
have. Even if that isn't the case (why mention old then?), wanting
Oberon features in rio means nothing unless it is specified what
features that are.

--=20
Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu