From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3d7dd75252b1dbc0f6eb69525dc69673@proxima.alt.za>
References: <CAOw7k5itSFLD2cJ57hNK2rn-A-J1dQeH9A12A2m7zcUswO7a_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<3d7dd75252b1dbc0f6eb69525dc69673@proxima.alt.za>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJhbSBIxIN2xINybmVhbnU=?= <aram.h@mgk.ro>
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2013 12:39:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEAzY395aBOrhLC+XW1=ZzGtQo074qu7YXA3G76414=ONXgORw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 913d0168-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 AM,  <lucio@proxima.alt.za> wrote:
> a merge of libmachs between Go
> and Plan 9 would in any case be an asset.

No, because the Go one changes all the time. E.g., now go puts half
the linker into the compilers; object files will contain real machine
code.

These details change all the time in the Go world.

--=20
Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu