From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1AB751B9-F2EB-499C-B172-387A4C3C40E7@corpus-callosum.com>
References: <CANZw+5d3kAAyzQhO7cVg_ULZOf0ypD-7gu_7exT9HEkxCoufSw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAK9Gx1dBm_Z75xSKPh46ar244msqPGydne4zOmM07Z3PZxLHVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEAzY3_4Qr5wPJ7b0Rt7EF6JGEpVK3Lo4GX5TTWZj=voYDoLsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<b25525bcdc1c981c402c2f9f4eb3eb3f@mikro.quanstro.net>
	<CAEAzY3-sXrn2BcTDn3_AaZkL6Xfe+DWXidbZoSwtGZRBsMtc2Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<1AB751B9-F2EB-499C-B172-387A4C3C40E7@corpus-callosum.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJhbSBIxIN2xINybmVhbnU=?= <aram.h@mgk.ro>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:12:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEAzY39YH=V1LrdqsbNM2gsHvFep6VzsNaMdE_TQXFQ5rJD43g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] VirtualBox, Mavericks, and Plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ed8dd168-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> If by =E2=80=98works=E2=80=99 you mean the an ancient version that doesn=
=E2=80=99t really run
> well on OS X 10.9.x, then sure.  So far, I=E2=80=99ve not gotten a versio=
n of
> qemu to build on OS X that would support Plan 9 or any other OS I=E2=80=
=99m
> interesting in testing.

I have both 1.6.1 and 2.0 on 10.9 (the latest). 1.6.1 is not ancient
and I didn't even need to compile it. Plan 9 runs just fine. 2.0 I
compiled because I needed the new arm64 support. It wasn't hard.

--=20
Aram H=C4=83v=C4=83rneanu