From: "Aram Hăvărneanu" <aram.h@mgk.ro>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on ESX?
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:26:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEAzY39ab-U2i_9EsNXsC8EJQAo=i_DL+dABJk8urpEjnah=1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eabdb68179bba55f80e58f3f5e544660@kw.quanstro.net>
> esxi != esx. they're very different products. (and even esxi requires
> more hardware for the same job.)
>
> the attaction for many people to using esx is that many it departments
> have it. they don't have esxi.
You missed the news, ESX as it used to be is no more, 4.1 was the last
release. ESXi is the thing people use now. The "enterprise" feature os
ESX that were unavailable in ESXi are in a VMware Infrastructure
(VSphere/VMotion).
> esxi is also close to the worst of both worlds. all the complications
> of virtualization, without what i see as the real benefit—vmotion.
> (live migration.)
VMotion is now simply an add-on product to ESXi, but yes, I agree with
your point.
--
Aram Hăvărneanu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-28 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 5:11 erik quanstrom
2012-03-28 5:24 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2012-03-28 10:31 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
[not found] ` <CAEAzY3_ake0cG6fPrAiLbkq+HZePwauAt4eo8=MrwFyG64y2hg@mail.gmail.c>
2012-03-28 13:28 ` erik quanstrom
2012-03-28 18:26 ` Aram Hăvărneanu [this message]
2012-03-28 18:28 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-28 4:46 Lucio De Re
2012-03-28 5:18 ` erik quanstrom
2012-03-28 4:53 ` cinap_lenrek
2012-03-28 4:56 ` cinap_lenrek
2012-03-28 13:37 ` erik quanstrom
2012-03-28 4:29 Lucio De Re
2012-03-28 4:27 Lucio De Re
2012-03-28 12:20 ` Richard Miller
2012-03-28 12:23 ` Richard Miller
2012-03-28 4:22 Lucio De Re
2012-03-27 21:30 David Leimbach
2012-03-27 22:38 ` Adrian Tritschler
2012-03-27 21:46 ` cinap_lenrek
2012-03-27 21:49 ` cinap_lenrek
[not found] ` <CA+FnbRMkcgQ2KueOnA=DB+udoD5Zw=LQu7vG7FKOEceaOEAmiw@mail.gmail.c>
2012-03-28 4:38 ` erik quanstrom
2012-03-28 4:53 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2012-03-28 5:28 ` Steven Stallion
2012-03-28 12:22 ` Richard Miller
[not found] ` <CAGGHmKEuQt70bAA=q=SBWs2B+xuNQZ1137LwMA7r0aKFdUzRJA@mail.gmail.c>
2012-03-28 5:41 ` erik quanstrom
2012-03-28 5:46 ` Steven Stallion
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEAzY39ab-U2i_9EsNXsC8EJQAo=i_DL+dABJk8urpEjnah=1A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=aram.h@mgk.ro \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).