From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Jules Merit Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 13:21:51 -0700 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e6c76100377053dd37632 Subject: Re: [9fans] Questions on the browser as a platform if plan 9 had gained marketshare Topicbox-Message-UUID: a27edb30-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a113e6c76100377053dd37632 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 "Whose?" white horse 112 1:19pm ring a bell? On Oct 1, 2016 1:19 PM, "Marshall Conover" wrote: > > I was browsing of my old plan 9 mail and this conversation from 2000 > made me think of your thread here: https://goo.gl/PO85oD > > That conversation was interesting! It seemed Matt was a pretty prescient > guy. The "supports the latest standards...whose?" bit gave me a chuckle. > > There wasn't too much in the way of directed conversation about what > different implementations of the web could've been, sadly, though there > were some - more just how feasible it'd be to implement the web as it was > on plan 9. I'm sure whatever Rob's intern was working has been lost to time. > > Thanks for finding it! > > --001a113e6c76100377053dd37632 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

"Whose?" white horse 112 1:19pm ring a bell?


On Oct 1, 2016 1:= 19 PM, "Marshall Conover" <marzhall.o@gmail.com> wrote:
--001a113e6c76100377053dd37632--