From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <911ca24da6d95f3c9cd5145a6fe4aad8@brasstown.quanstro.net> References: <20130303191130.GA13319@intma.in> <20130303192824.GA14748@intma.in> <911ca24da6d95f3c9cd5145a6fe4aad8@brasstown.quanstro.net> From: Dan Cross Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 19:10:09 -0500 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554db024d66c704d70e2f78 Subject: Re: [9fans] doing a native awk port (was Re: Bug in print(2) g verb) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 233f9b94-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --bcaec554db024d66c704d70e2f78 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:31 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > should i say "the current ot awk source"? it's certainly not > designed for plan 9. > Regardless you are right that it is clearly not worth porting to 'native' Plan 9 libraries or APIs; what, if anything, would be the benefit of such an effort? - Dan C. --bcaec554db024d66c704d70e2f78 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:31 PM,= erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
shou= ld i say "the current ot awk source"? =C2=A0it's certainly no= t
designed for plan 9.

Regardless y= ou are right that it is clearly not worth porting to 'native' Plan = 9 libraries or APIs; what, if anything, would be the benefit of such an eff= ort?

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 - Dan C.
<= div style>

--bcaec554db024d66c704d70e2f78--