From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+4OWrw4wz8ZVZtb4S6CUTGCtO1PgJoR1MeuRwTMruhKg6v79w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120828150521.GA10731@intma.in>
	<ea7f747589a78f5d1c0ed50a9a5b6ab7@proxima.alt.za>
	<20120828153548.GC11005@intma.in>
	<CAK=G1TjccyV2Zy0zR+hf4DMe2mGRg44D9WkKR66V=yHy-kHY8g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120831222403.GA81150@intma.in>
	<CAK=G1Tj_GSm704BtckwsEnpAH9Q17-iu+4Z_prGdxB+roJgAjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFSF3XOwBuny2MqZnCMX2skwKdqndZebA5A2TQUFzvGUdtMayw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+4OWrw4wz8ZVZtb4S6CUTGCtO1PgJoR1MeuRwTMruhKg6v79w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  2 Sep 2012 19:20:22 +0400
Message-ID: <CAF9FGtS9xYBNzneNPs2eBkkqVGzn5V0FjdEWDYs_EaUu0waRvQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: suharik <gleb.ax.sh@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b57bf152-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

(haven't read the thread)
There's some things that rc cannot into:
- break/continue (well, perhabs I can do it a ugly way)
- sane user interface (rlwrap rc won't give you THE TRUE POWER OF AUTOCOMPLETE)
- *nix standarts (no one wants to install plan9port or even 9base only
for running a script)
That's all. Anyway, rc is still nice for script writing.