From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEAzY3-GuDUAKbd3FxXtO5q6xBnvAGAVif-dnbffa_bjYE1qzw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJDwFdiAX8iW+7ggCB6VpguEVk2bx8d2yBA3Jeoh4N1TRYQTbA@mail.gmail.com>
	<b95e002fe9e82ff47c73f5dbdb02db0f@hamnavoe.com>
	<CAEAzY3-GuDUAKbd3FxXtO5q6xBnvAGAVif-dnbffa_bjYE1qzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  2 Feb 2016 13:53:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XM=L+nFh_P-Ybi0mcSzhKp5bP5Nm3zKxes04_HBPVzXCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc exec error behaviour
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 81a9746a-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> That serves as a useful test to gauge interest (and quality) in Go on Plan 9.

No, only in Go on 9front. It might be that other people are using
their own version of Plan 9 with Go at the same time. Also, what about
people who just don't think it's worth upgrading cause stuff still
works for them?

I don't get the point about quality.