* [9fans] renaming rio to rioc! @ 2018-10-02 14:28 Mayuresh Kathe 2018-10-02 17:31 ` Ethan Gardener 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mayuresh Kathe @ 2018-10-02 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans since it's not the original rio in plan9port, how about renaming it to rioc (rio clone)? ~mayuresh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] renaming rio to rioc! 2018-10-02 14:28 [9fans] renaming rio to rioc! Mayuresh Kathe @ 2018-10-02 17:31 ` Ethan Gardener 2018-10-02 18:08 ` hiro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Ethan Gardener @ 2018-10-02 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 9fans On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, at 3:28 PM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > since it's not the original rio in plan9port, how about renaming it to > rioc (rio clone)? Why? :) I can think of a good reason, but why don't you say why you want to do it? Just feelings of what is right and wrong? Personally, my own feelings of right and wrong with respect to computing have too often proved to be harmful, so I try not to take too much notice of them these days. If, on the other hand, you want to write a draw device implementation for the Linux framebuffer (or whatever) and port Plan 9's rio to it, bear in mind you'll also have to replace plan9port's devdraw binary. Just renaming it won't do; other programs launch it by name. Having users put your devdraw ahead of p9p in $PATH will work if I remember right, and the same trick will work for your rio. If you're distributing your own fork of plan9port, you have every right to rename or remove its supplied rio and devdraw. -- Progress might have been all right once, but it has gone on too long -- Ogden Nash ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] renaming rio to rioc! 2018-10-02 17:31 ` Ethan Gardener @ 2018-10-02 18:08 ` hiro 2018-10-03 21:25 ` Aram Hăvărneanu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: hiro @ 2018-10-02 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs drawterm runs on linux and has a draw device implementation already... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] renaming rio to rioc! 2018-10-02 18:08 ` hiro @ 2018-10-03 21:25 ` Aram Hăvărneanu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Aram Hăvărneanu @ 2018-10-03 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs > since it's not the original rio in plan9port, how about renaming > it to rioc (rio clone)? How about no. -- Aram Hăvărneanu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-03 21:25 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-10-02 14:28 [9fans] renaming rio to rioc! Mayuresh Kathe 2018-10-02 17:31 ` Ethan Gardener 2018-10-02 18:08 ` hiro 2018-10-03 21:25 ` Aram Hăvărneanu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).