From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <89FDB329-B008-41C3-BAB2-3B8B801BE9B2@gmail.com> <02f5fc7d-bf68-4f91-ab82-6b79d6cebe99@posteo.net> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2018 13:30:50 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P or better file services for multiple platforms Topicbox-Message-UUID: df7fc03a-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 i used to think it's good to put plan9 authentication in the linux kernel, and perhaps it's true, because linux is so big, this little more doesn't even hurt that much. but it might be better to extend the pseudo-plan9-kernels in drawterm/inferno in a way so that the linux kernel can talk plain 9p to them, so that less code has to depend on redhat^Wlinux patch-refusal monarchy. already cinap is supporting dp9ik in drawterm, so...