From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOk9ws1kxHh5MhRVwTMwPjM763++VmFMda-vefk8SZFt8y=OTg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOk9ws1kxHh5MhRVwTMwPjM763++VmFMda-vefk8SZFt8y=OTg@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  2 Sep 2018 18:52:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XNKZu1V=nYSo0vce0FvngjHMZpTtAh_yqb7S-yQt7MPXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [9fans] Is Plan 9 C "Less Dangerous?"
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e01e31c0-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

"prevailing wisdom" sounds like an oxymoron.

The plan 9 kernel has not enjoyed the pressure of attacks like more
common operating systems.

If you want to help, it's easy to discover bugs by reading the source
code, which is very short and readable.