From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9D936C7358 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:10:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from 23hiro@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 031FD2DC6B0; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:10:30 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1598962229; b=UzeaMRC2/7EK5BBU3C7hfEYJ32xnGXl0aj7+FSP9UoTB9WLkdr urGE1e9nvZcCcjsXVCDbfDKLJ0juHLRECph+lRkIFAe41JZescjEC+M3LFuKrjYI P/w4eWybvhy9Zggq+0545kHHBLsDus/DKL2RAuLUtthhE/Xxz1JstrOphoLIlWN/ qp1YoIpdOlIWyEvj9GPHgBSW+Nk4lLJrc8Ib5qYOEqgOs70rYZwFp5GQWjSKbMT+ dX6gaaWjFOfRoLHsMFjER+kjuv2khRCZCf4PB4eUE0xbJBsTW/eOB2EpQCeA1tgl xl+k4uM56pozKhEszPswxS1MSn0K04jJvI6A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1598962229; bh=MJ2svC12HO/yj8YXZbZd+X4IYDRTA7ibgEwtZBKfYzU=; b=G1q1JOE1nDHu vhWzTa1rCX2D6CY4sUMlLIg2Od9fp3fzp7aLqKBXfxZVyHAYylHkEei9n8BvH6M4 ALccXbdAWceKIk54a+gG1KQCS8sDFnwCIVLps+CY/oivOfYHwKaTS+kBmkauFPwZ G4HBCaqIKaUYM3Tp+FRM7sZdgFuFaJXSWOPf/PpLPIxIfJUQfVgvqCKOUNZIJWgs qKOEadxjXseWkUwGvewogAnuy5PJojJi0bH9S1twQ0TiWSXdE5DE5y+Z5q7f0W9e RR3rCuEDteyy6Wo/1J84BNxoTW8ED5gPTpVGrznFQL5RdRjiIMVCMSrpwKsvAE9y u2FoVpXvVQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=d0NB1cYI header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.218.65 (mail-ej1-f65.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=23hiro@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ej1-f65.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=Xe/+kBlt; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ej1-f65.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ej1-f65.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 Authentication-Results: tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=d0NB1cYI header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.218.65 (mail-ej1-f65.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=23hiro@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ej1-f65.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=Xe/+kBlt; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ej1-f65.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ej1-f65.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudefjedggeefucdltddurdegudehrddttd dmucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgf nhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttd enucenucfjughrpegjfhfhfffkuffvtgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhephhhirhho uceovdefhhhirhhosehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtveekve ffvdeiieetuedvgffhudekhfeltdevhefgfeekleffheelhedtvdeigfenucffohhmrghi nhepthhophhitggsohigrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvtdelrdekhedrvddukedrieehnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvddtledrkeehrddvudek rdeihedphhgvlhhopehmrghilhdqvghjuddqfheihedrghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhmrg hilhhfrhhomhepoedvfehhihhrohesghhmrghilhdrtghomhequcfukfgkgfepgeeffeel X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use '23hiro@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx1.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="23hiro@gmail.com"; helo=mail-ej1-f65.google.com; client-ip=209.85.218.65 Received: from mail-ej1-f65.google.com (mail-ej1-f65.google.com [209.85.218.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 08:10:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from 23hiro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-f65.google.com with SMTP id h4so1314405ejj.0 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 05:10:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MJ2svC12HO/yj8YXZbZd+X4IYDRTA7ibgEwtZBKfYzU=; b=d0NB1cYIZVfq7mpULjHzz8hN53vKqfvrjCNdddEhncSqj5HeiUbBh2e23sCOd/BxE4 TbV+VjSxmzYA/cHqOahMr69RhQR/vG1boQ4r7BBn4G61BYD0sqo7/Dl4gfF0qFwEV7Yz leSgM06J9SEEApQ7MgA4i0RzuJXY5dFetU0UPxvDZlmW2PLYrFKIS0cpMJisp+xM0USP Dpov1Q7Kv7PnAoru+7SF/8VdFXyjxisZcMlV3q951hhy0IKsUccsfah1J13aqjLtMggg tbxUeXlSW/q2GcjtvEQU1WqZeQXagZtQWPgq98SBCHJIAwxBqaxKKoUoAYOjMffg8m7U ElAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MJ2svC12HO/yj8YXZbZd+X4IYDRTA7ibgEwtZBKfYzU=; b=Xe/+kBltygHsdiUMeJk5OdQ/TCgR7rEO2rQ/Z/8VIIw7xaCvzvNv6tv/91kvC+xtof Xup9BaKjJBzoZyUL6aaCv+l1mzt4ISH5t+UT+r/x0t68mFqcoK+L38jNjnjC3HazxfyV HfWAnxwtCC1a1HWJe0/oBlEjuQa34UwyD3BYkhmEfwXN1HrnXi52Rni+eQZf62WlDy6P cv2xM7VURXgN9KaYUtcKieDX6Bo7dZ9XUH6vydUyajaopl04377rmDNr5/MDcXq+7sap K8rAO9s4M1tjP1FQS8n2Tu+X4O3rFjmJCpAPqliOSv42S+0zEJyjhFdcF5FumH5KgBvm Ksxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533lNT0og+NKvAKmaFwU3UllsSLQjKkOAMEEWuEtGJ+ykukoeV44 aYAVddfOedLJjiAyBtUaGeVwoQECirsqYXkKwpskf5Xs31g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9ylh2Y+CxnyxgNZ0XSdmTbH+7/WPex6YAbXhp1uClEu+LFdR34253iUXwfJjJ1cYH22JIaWxFyHV3SH+Gz6s= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2858:: with SMTP id s24mr1084716ejc.399.1598962228307; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 05:10:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a17:906:29c2:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 05:10:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87684ac5-639f-4fe7-8554-02e41009d044@www.fastmail.com> References: <20FC18E5C59C4F6B76DD591B43654668@eigenstate.org> <87684ac5-639f-4fe7-8554-02e41009d044@www.fastmail.com> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:10:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 in Brazil To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 23f6e2ec-ec4c-11ea-b062-9d3b8b7b792b > developing new, non-unix operating systems which? On 9/1/20, Ethan Gardener wrote: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2020, at 10:30 PM, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: >> > I really don't understand why Plan 9 has not been adopted. Legacy base? >> >> Porting software is expensive and time consuming. Unix >> mostly works. On top of that, Unix has many features. >> Bolted on in ways that don't fit, but features that >> aren't provided by Plan 9 tools, nonetheless. >> >> When given a familiar but ugly environment with more >> features, which requires less work to get their familiar >> software running, what do you expect the result to be? > > I agree, and add to all that the fact that Linux was popular and > well-regarded many years before Plan 9 became open-source. Plan 9 was not > only expensive, but IIRC hardly available before it was open-sourced in > 2000. > > Also, denial of a serious bug in Fossil must have contributed to crushing > what little chance Plan 9 had in this century. It took over 10 years to fix > a serious data corruption bug which affected most, perhaps almost all new > users. What commercial developer or balanced hobbyist would put up with > that? For some perspective, see mycroftiv's mail: [9fans] notes on fossil, > ANTS, and 9front/Bell labs controversies. He put a lot of effort into > working around failure of the root filesystem. I'm sorry for the part I've > played in contributing to the Plan 9 attitude problem, and I'm glad to see > it has faded away. > > With the attitude problem gone and some corporations developing new, > non-unix operating systems, I think Plan 9 could well become more popular > than it's ever been. > > ------------------------------------------ > 9fans: 9fans > Permalink: > https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T46e6d1465ae13031-M84bf4987dcdd85beea8fdbc6 > Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription >