From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0C27ADF2-82BC-4F7F-9AA0-6D219789C3DE@quintile.net>
References: <1799452333.7330135.1514744928423.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
	<1799452333.7330135.1514744928423@mail.yahoo.com>
	<0C27ADF2-82BC-4F7F-9AA0-6D219789C3DE@quintile.net>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 21:43:07 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XODhvT3NOksM7Ldec_bqCooK5q1bmm1+sS__wzorKZxJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [9fans] Inferno on microcontrollers
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c8267dac-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> i would be very happy to see a modern browser on plan9, though
> i would not want anyone to spend a lot of time supporting one.

> in the meantime i just use remote desktop to a windows box.

what's the difference really? i also remote into a windows box, from
my linux box. and i drawterm into my 9front box. why not have all of
those, at the same time, instead of faking one to be more like the
other?