From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <390CBB9301CFDF98AABA5633128CFC10@felloff.net> References: <390CBB9301CFDF98AABA5633128CFC10@felloff.net> From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:56:04 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Topicbox-Message-UUID: ea48a734-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 he has ignored my questions about measurement, so i'm sure he hasn't On 10/9/18, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote: > also, i wonder how much is the actual copy overhead you claim is the issue. > maybe the impact for copying is more dominated by the memory allocator used > for allocb(). have you measured? > > -- > cinap > >