From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151019004825.GB65657@wopr.sciops.net>
References: <be2e12a098ae8ce9544878d7dd768842@9netics.com>
	<324d02717849dcd7f9aa8e55277f8ca4@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20151019000914.GA65657@wopr.sciops.net>
	<72179c21822f36216c7669a1f125f32e@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20151019004825.GB65657@wopr.sciops.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:28:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFSF3XOtd=CpOXL3e4_ce_kN5PW+XtxWNzgwQvkhFyAhcs9mjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: hiro <23hiro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 73c829ae-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement
the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would
you buy it?
Why does VNC require an fpga, are you going to transfer enormous resolutions?
If yes then I personally would use UDP and a lossy and loss tolerant
compression.
If not I would use TCP and no FPGA.